Removal Of Lipoma On Ribs

excuses instead of objections - Jürgen Trittin for unconditional basic income

Jürgen Trittin (Alliance 90/The Greens) has Answered on Members Watch a question about the unconditional basic income. This he writes:

"... we have a vigorous debate on an unconditional basic income have led We take these proposals very seriously our view, but met with skepticism, if advertised with the fact that an unconditional basic income is a global alternative to.. could be existing welfare state ... "
Well, that represents no serious proponents if all this is implied (see, for example here), the skepticism is therefore not appropriate, it hangs in the air.

further:
"... the most welfare-state institutions will not be deprived of the pension can not exceed. Night will be abolished, for many decades, the acquired rights would serve to ... "
Even the abolition of night calls no one, even one not the one who gestelllt the question to Mr. Trittin. Acquired rights can be served, but it is a question of political will, as has long done the addition could be the BGE to cover part of the claims, others would be met from general taxation here than it will have to be a discussion So, no viable objection

Next:....
"... can not on health insurance, care insurance, or the integration assistance for disabled be waived ... "Also, no one calls
seriously, however. health insurance can be altered, as well as the long-term care, maybe they would not be necessary, the same would apply to the integration could help you through the BGE at the rate of be replaced BGES objection then

Next:.. want to work
"... As many citizens, is in our view, labor market policy is not expendable. Not to mention the fact that educational institutions must be improved and expanded ... "
could labor market policy, where it would be necessary, but very different. As our education system should look would have to make it strengthens the individual, is another matter, is no objection to the BGE, but related: just that BGE provides an easy way education efforts, because it strengthens the individual as such. Again, it will have to be a discussion. Properly dispersed.

Next:
"... A nationally uniform basic income would also not convincing, the very different housing costs should be considered as (a regionalization or the housing allowance) Also, the needs of the applicant not be lumped together... Specific requirements would cover so legally. This would will also remain an authority that would rule on such questions ... "
Has Jürgen Trittin involved in this debate? He knows the arguments? Here one gets the impression that he has no objections, but excuses. Of course, to above requirements of BGES be met. Is that BGE would be high enough, a housing allowance unnecessary if possible. Besides, there are strong objections to a regional adaptation of BGES. Such was the metropolitan education encourage. Without housing benefit, however, the rental market would be forced to the new Conditions at, at least if it were still public housing.

instead differentiated objections, only excuses to not to support a BGE. Since we know at least what one of the Greens, which are in the majority has. done

Sascha Liebermann