... the FAZ report and mirror in its online edition. Sounds good, right? Sounds as if the situation perfectly. Anyone who views the world through statistics and their interpretation is such a theoretical model, normatively charged definitions as "full employment" (it also the reference to Wolfgang Streng-Kuhn-operated), can then report especially good. In this respect is the contribution of example for seeing the world through a certain frame (but see this also "There is no employment miracle" )
It is a different situation, if not on statistical correlations in the light of certain normative interpretations of view is addressed, but are interested in the individual situation. The first would be those mentioned here that belong to the 2.5% who have no job. For her: "Every pain has a name" (see also "academics threatens poverty in old age" ). Such a added to the concrete individual-oriented approach in the statistics per se is no room, so she says of opportunities for individuals from nothing. Even of those who have a job, we do not know if she would like to do something else, if given the opportunities, if they did not work more efficiently when working conditions could be negotiated, etc. Also, we do not know which of these Points would be automated if this would be politically desirable and encouraged.
In short, this whole full employment terminology leads nowhere, but rather a reason for existing facilities not to see serious it blocks the view, confused. Even those who are not employed gainfully shaped can of course be fully employed, such as the search for a job (see "full employment from the perspective of the modern labor market theory" ) or so, something else to do in their eyes useful. This understanding will be taken for granted, then the unconditional basic income is nothing in the way.
Sascha Liebermann
0 comments:
Post a Comment